The client asks for "one small thing" that was not in the plan. Then another. Each one is reasonable alone. Together they eat your margin, and by the time you say something, you are annoyed and the reply shows it.
The fix is to answer early, with the agreement in front of you, and give the client a choice instead of a no.
Step 1: check the request against what you agreed
Before you write anything, open the proposal, the scope of work or the email thread where you confirmed the deliverables. Put the new request next to it and sort it into one of three:
- In scope. It was agreed, perhaps in different words. Do it and do not make it a discussion.
- Unclear. The agreement can be read two ways. Ask a question, and do not assume the worst of either side.
- Out of scope. It is not in what you agreed. This is the one you reply to.
Be fair here. If your own wording was vague, say so to yourself and treat the case as unclear.
Step 2: decide your options
Out-of-scope requests have usually three honest answers:
- Do it as an extra, with a price and a time impact.
- Swap it for something already in scope.
- Park it for a later phase.
Decide which you can offer. Do not offer free work you do not want to give, and do not offer a price you have not worked out.
Step 3: draft the reply
Help me write a short, friendly email replying to a client's request that is outside the agreed scope. Use only the facts I give. Do not invent contract terms, prices, dates or past conversations.
What we agreed (paste the relevant lines, or write "no written scope"):
[paste]
The client's new request (paste their message):
[paste]
Options I can offer (use only these):
[for example: extra at a price of X, adding Y days / swap for Z / do it in phase two]
My tone: [warm and direct / formal / short]
Write the email with this shape:
1. One sentence that shows I understood the request and that it makes sense.
2. One or two sentences saying plainly that it sits outside what we agreed, and pointing to what we agreed.
3. The options, as a short list, each with its effect on price and timing as I gave them.
4. One clear question asking which they prefer, and by when.
Rules: no blame, no sarcasm, no apologising for the agreement, no threats. Under 150 words. If you need a fact I did not give, write [CONFIRM: what you need] instead of guessing.Step 4: read it as the client would
Does it say what you agreed, accurately? Are the numbers yours? Would you be happy to see this email in a dispute later? Cut anything that sounds like a score being kept.
Send it soon after the request. A reply on the same day feels like service. A reply three weeks and four extras later feels like an accusation.
Step 5: record the change
When the client picks an option, confirm it in writing: what changes, the new price and the new date. A short email is enough. If your contract has a change process, use it.
Limits
- The draft does not know your contract. If it has terms on change requests or payment, follow them, and take legal advice for a real dispute.
- It cannot tell whether a request is in scope. You decide that in step 1.
- Some clients push back anyway. A good reply makes the next conversation easier, not unnecessary.
- If the client has stopped paying or the work has stopped, this is the wrong tool. See a different process.
Follow for new free skills
New free skills and guides appear in all of these as we publish them. Pick whichever you already use.
- RSS feed for any feed reader
- Watch the free skills repo on GitHub
- Follow on Gumroad