Recruiter BD Brief

Before (a plain chatbot, from memory): "a fast-growing bank with a finance team that is expanding in London". That is a guess.

After (this workflow, on a real public company site in our test): the brief quotes "Four offices in London, Cardiff, Southampton and Manchester" with its link, says the careers page showed no roles in the text it could read, says no hiring person is named, and tells you to check the live jobs list before sending. On a small firm with a three-page site it said so, named only the founder the page names, and warned that the email had no hiring hook.

For agency recruiters and business developers.

Give it a company and the desk you place. It opens the company's own pages (about, news, careers) and gives you one page: what they do, recent news, open roles and hiring signals, the hiring manager only if a page names one, angles for your desk and what to find out before you write. Every line carries a short quote and its link, or says "not found". Then it drafts a short first email to the hiring manager that cites one real fact from the brief and offers one small thing you can actually do.

Chatbots asked for this on their own tend to fill the gaps: a funding round that never happened, a hiring manager with a plausible name. A hiring manager spots that in one line. This workflow is built to leave a gap instead.

• On a thin site it gives a short brief with many 'not found' lines. That is the correct answer, and the email then has no hiring hook.
• It names a hiring manager only if a page ties a person to hiring, or a small firm's page names its founder. It does not look people up.
• It is a draft. Open the links and check the person's current role before you send.
• It cannot know whether the company uses agencies, its budget or its current supplier.